Affirmative Action Decision: Huge Diversity Efforts Implications and for Businesses

Report Issue

Please complete the required fields.

Your Name

Email

Reason (required)
This post contains broken linksPost has incorrect informationPost has spamCopyright IssueOther

Description

Submit

Companies could see serious downstream effects for businesses stemming from the Supreme Court’s decision overturning the use of affirmative action in college admissions—even though the court didn’t directly address diversity efforts.

Companies will face a talent pipeline problem.
When states have banned affirmative action, enrollment of Black students in universities declined—and that decrease in campus diversity could translate into a less diverse workforce. Indeed, one 2013 study from economist Fidan Ana Kurtulus found that workplaces became less diverse where the practice was outlawed.

“Over the next decade, traditional talent pipelines will become less diverse because of this ruling,” writes Joelle Emerson, the CEO of Paradigm, a diversity consulting company about this issue.

The ruling is “a problem for our economy because businesses often rely on colleges and universities to provide a diverse pipeline of talent for recruitment and hiring,” said Charlotte Burrows, the chair of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, in a statement Thursday.

U.S. Businesses have a strong interest in hiring a diverse workforce to remain maximally competitive in an increasingly diverse country. More than 20 top companies, including Accenture, Apple, General Motors, Google and United Airlines, made that argument in an amicus brief before the Court.

Attending a diverse school helps prepare students for the experience of working with different kinds of people as clients, colleagues, and customers, they note.

The amici point to research that finds diverse teams are better at decision-making, creativity and communications.

“Diverse groups can better understand and serve the increasingly diverse population that uses their products and services. These benefits are not simply intangible; they translate into businesses’ bottom lines.”

In the run-up to the decision and in its aftermath, there’s been much hand-wringing about a chilling effect on corporate diversity efforts. There’s a concern that businesses will scale back on DEI fearing they’ll be next up in the crosshairs of those who argue such efforts discriminate.