

The Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision last week curtailing the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s ability to regulate power plant pollution left untouched one of the strongest tools to reduce greenhouse gas pollution under the Clean Air Act — a nationwide greenhouse gas pollution cap.
“The Supreme Court ruling forecloses some action under one Clean Air Act program but leaves the door wide open for Biden to make big cuts to fossil fuel emissions and steer the country away from climate chaos,” said Maya Golden-Krasner, deputy director of the Center’s Climate Law Institute. “A nationwide climate pollution cap is the heart of the Clean Air Act, and it could achieve significant pollution reductions. We can’t afford any more half-measures and delays.”
In 2009 the Center and 350.org petitioned the EPA to use its full powers under the Clean Air Act to list greenhouse gas pollution as a criteria pollutant and set a nationwide emissions cap in the form of a “national ambient air quality standard,” or NAAQS. Under the Act, EPA must set the science-based standard at the level that’s necessary to protect human health and welfare and the environment.
Last year the EPA reopened consideration of the petition after it withdrew the Trump administration’s denial of it, noting that “the agency did not fully and fairly assess the issues raised by the petition.” The Center urged the EPA to move ahead with the cap because the urgency of the climate crisis and evidence that the dangers of global heating to human health and survival have only grown since the 2009 petition.
Latino Youth Mental Health Crisis Demands Focus on Boys and Young Men
SB 961 Explained: A Simple Fix That Could Help Thousands of California College Students Access CalFresh
IMMIGRATION
Study Shows Dramatic Rise in Deportations and Street Arrests
POLITICS
Quality of Life Confidence Collapses in Los Angeles County
Bass and the Big “I” in LAUSD Talks
Andrés Chait Proves His Leadership in LAUSD Deal That Delivers Wins for Teachers and Staff
CD1: No Winners in What Was Supposed to Be the First Candidates’ Forum. If They Can’t Agree, What Can Residents Expect?