Petition to

The problem of the juvenile halls in LA county goes beyond funds

Parriva Parriva · US
 juvenile halls

A bill heading to Gov. Gavin Newsom’s desk could direct hundreds of millions of state dollars to Los Angeles County’s troubled juvenile halls, but youth justice advocates and two county supervisors are pushing for a veto, arguing it would waste money on a “very broken system.”

AB 695, introduced by assemblymember Blanca Pacheco, would give the Board of State and Community Corrections — an agency that recently shuttered two of the county's juvenile halls over poor conditions — the ability to provide state grants to Los Angeles County for infrastructure improvements, including the construction of new living quarters for youth in custody and modernized spaces for rehabilitative and educational programs.

The bill passed in the Legislature the same week that the BSCC warned it may be forced to close more of Los Angeles County's juvenile facilities, including the newly reopened Los Padrinos Juvenile Hall, over failed inspections.

Although AB 695 doesn't set a dollar amount, the Senate Appropriations Committee estimates the hit to the state's general fund will be in the “high hundreds of millions” of dollars — potentially up to $1 billion — to address the “critical needs of the youth facilities in Los Angeles.”

Opponents worry that such a high level of funding will only make the county more reliant on its flawed Probation Department and the prison-like detention facilities that the county has pledged to replace — with little progress so far — with “less restrictive” alternatives.

'Youth Justice Reimagined' Instead, the youth reform advocates want to see L.A. County follow through with the implementation of Youth Justice Reimagined, a proposal unanimously approved by the Board of Supervisors in 2020. That plan would place youth in the custody of the newly created Department of Youth Development and dedicate resources to diversion and intervention programs, in- home confinement and the construction of smaller “safe and secure healing centers” spread throughout the county.

More money for better buildings won't solve these problems. It's true that Central Juvenile Hall, now finally closed for good, is more than a century old, but the problem was never the hardware — the buildings, the equipment, the vehicles. The problem is the software — the people and their willingness to do the jobs for which they are paid. And a Probation Department culture that makes crises a daily routine.

September 18, 2023
Letter to

AB 695
Introduced by Assembly Member Pacheco

An act to add Chapter 1.55 (commencing with Section 1979) to Division 2.5 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, relating to juveniles.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST

AB 695, as amended, Pacheco. Juvenile Detention Facilities Improvement Grant Program.

Existing law requires the Board of State and Community Corrections to adopt minimum standards for the operation and maintenance of juvenile halls for the confinement of minors.

Existing law requires the judge of the juvenile court of the county to annually inspect any jail or juvenile hall that was used for the confinement of any minor and to notify the operator of the jail or juvenile hall of any observed noncompliance with the minimum standards of the juvenile facility adopted by the board. Existing law defines a county of the first class as a county containing a population of 4,000,000 and over.

Upon appropriation by the Legislature, this bill would create the Juvenile Detention Facilities Improvement Grant Program, to be administered by the Office of Youth and Community Restoration, board, to provide grants to a county of the first class to address the critical infrastructure needs of the state’s detained and supervised youth in the county.

The bill would require, as a condition for receiving a grant, a county of the first class to prepare a juvenile detention facilities improvement plan for the expenditure of funds for capital improvements that are necessary to preserve and protect the county’s juvenile detention facilities to enhance each facility’s rehabilitation function.

The bill would require the plan to be approved by both the office board and the governing body of the county. The bill would require the office, board, by January 1, 2025, to submit a report to the budget and public safety committees of the Legislature detailing the grants awarded and the projects funded through the program.

This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the County of Los Angeles.

DIGEST KEY
Vote: majority Appropriation: no Fiscal Committee: yes Local Program: no

Updates

More updates...
Parriva
Parriva
Started this petition 1 year ago

Write a Reply or Comment

You should Sign In or Sign Up account to post comment.

214 Supporters
786 needed to reach 1,000
By signing you accept the terms of services and the privacy policy  from Parriva and accept to receive occasional emails about campaigns on Parriva. You can unsubscribe at any time.